The cross-ratio of four distinct points is

Convention warning: textbooks order the four points differently. Some swap and , some negate, some take the reciprocal. All six permutations are related by Möbius transformations of the cross-ratio itself, so the “invariant under Möbius transformations” property holds in every convention, but the algebraic formula differs. Check the convention before cross-referencing. This note uses the one where and : the first reference point maps to , the third to .

It’s the invariant of Möbius transformations: if is a Möbius transformation, then

Three points to three points

This solves the three-points-to-three-points problem for Möbius transformations.

Given , , , the unique Möbius transformation sending satisfies

Solve for as a function of and you have the transformation.

Worked example

Find the Möbius transformation sending , , .

Direct approach with : , so . ; . Solving: , . Taking : .

Verify: , . ✓ . ✓

Cross-ratio with

If one of the four points is , the formula uses the convention that ratios involving simplify limit-style. For example,

(the as ).

So the cross-ratio extends naturally to the Riemann sphere.

Real cross-ratio ↔ concyclic

Four points lie on a circle (or a line) iff their cross-ratio is real. This follows from Möbius transformations preserving “circles and lines”.

In context

The cross-ratio comes from projective geometry, going back to the ancient Greeks. In complex analysis it parameterizes Möbius transformations and captures their action on four-point configurations.

Transmission-line theory and the Smith chart use cross-ratio-style invariants to track impedance transformations as a wave propagates along a line.