A lossy transmission line has nonzero and/or : finite conductor resistance per unit length and/or finite shunt conductance per unit length. As a wave propagates, its amplitude decays exponentially and its phase velocity may depend on frequency. This is the realistic model of any cable carrying RF or high-speed signals over appreciable distances.
A lossless approximation (where ) is convenient, but lossy effects limit cable length, system bandwidth, and receiver sensitivity.
Distributed parameters
The lumped-element model retains all four parameters:
- originates from finite conductor conductivity. At high frequency, skin effect concentrates current in a thin surface layer, increasing as .
- originates from dielectric loss, imperfect insulators dissipating energy. For real polyethylene at room temperature, scales roughly with .
- and are nearly the same as in the lossless case; they describe the magnetic and electric field storage of the line cross-section.
Propagation constant and characteristic impedance
The Propagation constant becomes complex:
(Np/m) is the attenuation constant, how fast wave amplitude drops with distance. (rad/m) is the phase constant.
The Characteristic impedance becomes complex too:
In general , with a small phase angle. A lossless line has real (); a lossy line has with small but nonzero.
Forward and backward waves
The wave solutions on a lossy line:
Forward wave amplitude shrinks as . Backward wave amplitude grows in , because it’s traveling in and decaying as it goes. So the standing-wave pattern on a mismatched lossy line is less pronounced near the source (where the forward wave is strongest relative to the reflected wave that has decayed twice) than near the load.
Low-loss approximation
For most engineering lines at moderate frequencies, and . Expanding to first order in and :
splits into a conductor-loss contribution () and a dielectric-loss contribution (). Designers minimize one or the other depending on which dominates.
in this limit is just the lossless value — small losses don’t shift the wave speed much. remains nearly real, justifying the lossless calculation for many practical purposes.
When losses cease to be “small”
The low-loss expansion fails when:
- (DC limit): dominates over , dominates over . The line transitions to a diffusive regime described by the “telegraph equation” with damping, the case for high-loss audio and power lines.
- : skin effect makes . The conductor loss eventually keeps up with in proportion.
At microwave frequencies (multi-GHz) in a typical RG-58 coax, conductor losses become the bottleneck. Below 1 GHz, both losses are small enough that “low-loss” formulas are accurate to within a few percent.
Power and decay
The time-averaged power in the forward wave decays as
Twice the attenuation in power because power ∝ amplitude². For a 100 m cable with Np/m: . About 90 dB of attenuation, which may or may not be acceptable depending on system budget.
In dB: . Cables are commonly specified in dB/100m at a few representative frequencies.
Distortion
A pulse on a lossy line spreads because and are frequency-dependent. Different Fourier components attenuate and delay at different rates. The result:
- Amplitude distortion: high frequencies attenuate more (in most media), low-pass filtering the pulse.
- Phase distortion (dispersion): different frequency components arrive at different times, smearing the pulse temporally.
These are the practical signal-integrity issues that limit data rates on long cables. Equalization (frequency-shaping the transmitter or receiver) is the standard countermeasure: pre-emphasis at the source, equalization filter at the receiver. Used in everything from Ethernet to SerDes to coaxial undersea cables.
When matching matters more
On a lossy line with strong reflections, the multiple-bounce pattern between source and load decays as each round trip loses (assuming partial reflection at each end). For very lossy lines, even bad mismatches eventually settle, the reflections dying out before causing trouble. For low-loss lines (the regime we usually want), reflections persist for many round trips and matching matters more.
This is why high-frequency precision instruments use low-loss cables AND careful matching: the lower the loss, the more visible the mismatch.
Versus lossless
| Lossless | Lossy | |
|---|---|---|
| , | 0 | > 0 |
| , | ||
| Real | Complex (small imaginary part) | |
| Slightly frequency-dependent | ||
| Attenuation | None | |
| Use | Idealization, lab standards | Real cables |
The lossless model gets used for analysis and Smith-chart work; the lossy model is needed for budget calculations, system simulation, and any practical cable specification.