The characteristic equation of a constant-coefficient linear ODE is the polynomial equation you get by substituting the trial solution and dividing through. Its roots determine the general solution.
For a second-order ODE (constants ), the trial gives , . Substituting:
Since , we need
This is the characteristic equation. Its roots are the values of that make a solution.
Why
A second-order ODE relates . For , all three are proportional to — the only difference is the coefficient (). So the equation becomes , a polynomial in .
Polynomials we can solve. ODEs we generally can’t.
Characteristic equation in LTI systems
The same polynomial shows up under a different name in linear time-invariant systems. Take the Transfer function of an LTI system. Setting the denominator to zero,
is the characteristic equation of the system, and its roots are the poles of .
The connection to ODEs is direct. For a constant-coefficient ODE with zero initial conditions, Laplace-transforming gives , so . The denominator is exactly the characteristic polynomial you’d get from the trial . Same polynomial, two viewpoints: in the time-domain trial vs. in the Laplace-domain transfer function.
So a root of the characteristic equation is a pole of the transfer function, and the corresponding natural mode of the system is — exactly the homogeneous solution. Pole locations determine stability and transient behavior: left-half-plane poles () give decaying modes, right-half-plane poles give growing (unstable) modes, and imaginary-axis poles give sustained oscillation.
Three cases based on the discriminant
The discriminant tells you the nature of the roots:
Case 1: — distinct real roots
Two real roots . Two linearly independent solutions:
Wronskian: .
General solution:
Example: . Characteristic: , roots . Solution: .
Case 2: — repeated real root
One root . The first solution is .
(Note: the Differential Equations lecture PDF stops here for this case, leaving the second-solution derivation incomplete. The actual result, derived below, is .)
To get a second linearly independent solution, multiply by :
Direct verification: and . Substituting into :
The second bracket is the characteristic equation evaluated at , which is zero. The first bracket is (using the repeated-root condition ). So the whole expression vanishes — is indeed a solution. Independent of because they’re not proportional.
(Or derive systematically via Method of reduction of order, starting from .)
General solution:
Case 3: — complex conjugate roots
Two complex roots where , .
The complex-valued solutions and aren’t useful for real-valued problems. By Euler’s formula:
For an ODE with real coefficients, if is a complex-valued solution, then and are real-valued solutions of the same equation.
Taking real and imaginary parts:
These are linearly independent (Wronskian = ). General solution:
Example: , , .
Characteristic: , roots . So , .
General solution: .
Apply initial conditions to find — straightforward but tedious.
Higher-order
For -th order ODEs, the characteristic polynomial is degree . For each root of multiplicity , the contribution to the general solution is .
For example, with multiplicity 3 contributes — three linearly independent solutions.
For complex roots in higher orders, you pair conjugates and use the real form analogously.
In context
The characteristic equation handles all constant-coefficient homogeneous linear ODEs. For variable coefficients, you need Method of reduction of order or, for second-order, sometimes power series methods (not in this vault). For nonhomogeneous equations, find the homogeneous part with the characteristic equation, then add a particular solution via Method of undetermined coefficients or Method of variation of parameters.